Powered by

Home Google

In Chrome, Google starts to phase out third-party cookies

The article explores Google's phased elimination of third-party cookies in Chrome through Tracking Protection. While Google aims to address privacy concerns, critics warn of potential oversights, regarding the disruptive influence of generative AI.

By Sakshi
New Update

Google starts to phase out third-party cookies

Listen to this article
0.75x 1x 1.5x
00:00 / 00:00


Google has embarked on a strategic initiative to gradually eliminate third-party cookies in its Chrome browser, aligning with the broader Privacy Sandbox initiative. The company aims to achieve this goal by introducing Tracking Protection to a select group of 1% of Chrome users, with a comprehensive plan to phase out all third-party cookies by the second half of 2024.

Privacy Initiative: Curbing Cross-Site Tracking through Tracking Protection

The central objective of Google's initiative is to address privacy concerns by implementing Tracking Protection. This feature restricts website access to third-party cookies, thereby curbing cross-site tracking. The decision to eliminate third-party cookies was initially announced in 2021, following an investigation by the European Union into Google's advertising operations. Notably, competitors such as Apple (Safari in 2020) and Mozilla (Firefox in 2019) have also taken measures to block third-party cookies. Google strategically unveiled Tracking Protection in December as a pivotal element of its comprehensive strategy.


Regulatory Landscape: Navigating Privacy Concerns and Regulatory Actions

Google's move to discontinue third-party cookies and deploy Tracking Protection is not only driven by privacy concerns but also by the desire to avoid regulatory action. With the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority looming as a regulatory force, Google seeks to maintain its ad revenue while adhering to evolving privacy standards.

Criticisms and Shortcomings: Generative AI and the Unforeseen Challenges

Despite Google's efforts, critics argue that the approach may be insufficient in the face of technological advancements, particularly in the realm of generative AI. IDC analyst Gerry Murray emphasizes that Google's strategy lacks foresight, failing to account for the potential disruptive impact of generative AI agents on cross-domain tracking, consumer databases, and the evolution of digital marketplaces based on programmatic intent.

The Generative AI Threat: Potential Disruption to Google's Dominance

Murray suggests that generative AI agents pose a significant threat to Google's dominance in the digital economy. As these agents enable consumers to participate in digital marketplaces based on programmatic intent, Murray envisions a shift from revenue based on impressions to a commission-based model. The emergence of generative AI introduces a potential upheaval with profound implications for all stakeholders in the digital economy.

Marketers' Response: Transition to Customer Data Platforms (CDPs)

In response to Google's planned depreciation of third-party cookies, marketers are increasingly adopting Customer Data Platforms (CDPs) to leverage the first-party data they collect. David Raab, founder of the CDP Institute, highlights that many organizations purchasing digital advertising are unprepared for the post-cookie era. CDPs offer novel applications, providing marketers with finer control over audience traits and targeted ad spending.

Google's Preparedness: Chrome Testing Signals Readiness for Transition

While Google has long planned to move away from third-party cookies, recent testing of Google Chrome indicates the company's readiness to execute its plan later this year. David Raab underscores the business motivation for Google to eliminate cookies, citing a valid excuse for privacy concerns to appease regulators. The implementation of Tracking Protection is seen as a tangible indicator of Google's commitment to the broader initiative according to Google updates.