Advertisment

John Mueller Sheds Light on AI-Generated Images and Stock Photography

In this article, we dissect Google Search Advocate John Mueller's perspective on the juxtaposition of AI-generated images and stock photography.

author-image contribution
Sakshi
2 Min read
New Update
AI
Listen to this article
0.75x 1x 1.5x
00:00 / 00:00

John Mueller, Google Search Advocate, recently shared his thoughts on the use of AI-generated images on websites versus stock photography in a discussion on Twitter. This article will delve into Mueller's insights and provide a comprehensive comparison between AI-generated images and stock photography based on google updates.

AI-Generated Images vs. Stock Photography

According to Mueller, AI-generated images can be a viable alternative to stock photography, but they may not be suitable for all contexts. He suggests that users are more inclined to search visually for topics where real images are more relevant. In this sense, AI-generated images can be considered as a supplement to stock photography, rather than a complete replacement.

Quality Standards of AI-Generated Images

Mueller cautions against the ease and temptation of using AI-generated images as a time and cost-saving measure. He emphasizes the importance of evaluating the quality of AI-generated images and ensuring that they meet the same standards as traditional stock photography. This includes considering factors such as resolution, clarity, and relevance to the content.

Decorative Images & Real Product Photography 

In the context of decorative images, Mueller notes that the level of effort put into the content can enhance user trust. However, he criticizes the use of AI-generated images for product photography, as they may not accurately represent the actual product. In contrast, real product photography can provide a more accurate and detailed representation of the product, which can lead to better user engagement and conversion rates.

Conceptual Illustrations

Regarding conceptual illustrations, Mueller highlights the value of using 3D models. He differentiates between 3D-rendered images based on actual building plans and fully AI-generated images, likening the latter to decorative blog post imagery. This suggests that AI-generated images can be useful for enhancing the visual appeal of content, but they may not be as effective in conveying complex concepts or providing detailed product information.

Practical Advice for Website Owners

Based on Mueller's discussion, website owners should consider the following factors when deciding between AI-generated images and stock photography:

  • Relevance: Determine whether the topic requires real images or if AI-generated images would be more appropriate.
  • Quality: Evaluate the quality of AI-generated images and ensure they meet the same standards as traditional stock photography.
  • Context: Consider the context in which the images will be used and whether AI-generated images would be more suitable for decorative purposes or real product photography.
  • Conceptual Illustrations: For complex concepts or detailed product information, consider using 3D models or real product photography instead of AI-generated images.

In conclusion, AI-generated images can be a useful supplement to stock photography, but they may not be suitable for all contexts. Website owners should carefully consider the above factors when deciding between AI-generated images and traditional stock photography to ensure the best user experience and engagement.

 

Google Updates